Martin and Hansen had identified a certain immune protein that could bind to — and alter— T cells in the lab. This pivotal finding showed that certain molecules could change how T cells behave — an essential step for modern approaches to cellular immunotherapy. June began developing methods for multiplying T cells in the lab using that immune protein. In a previous interview, he described the period in Martin and Hansen’s lab as “being in the right place at the right time.”
Then, of course, there was Thomas, leader and founder of the transplant research group. June recalled what it was like to attend meetings with the pioneering researcher to discuss managing various challenging cases.
“He was intimately involved, but the decisions were made by consensus,” he said. “He led. He was a very good leader. He used the brains of everyone.”
June also has admiring memories of Thomas’ wife and life-long research partner, the “mother of bone marrow transplantation,” Dottie Thomas.
“I can remember a paper that I wrote that [Don] was on,” he said. “Dottie checked every reference. And this was before we had computer searches. She had his back. He and Dottie were an amazing team.”
‘The immune system mattered in cancer’
In the early days of bone marrow transplantation, scientists did not yet fully understand the key role played by the immune system: Donor stem cells were not merely replacing a leukemia or lymphoma patient’s immune system after it had been destroyed by chemotherapy and radiation, they were actually contributing to the cure.
“The bone marrow transplantation that Don [Thomas] and Rainer Storb and others did was initially thought to work because of super-lethal chemotherapy,” June said.
The realization that the transplanted immune system itself played a role in curing cancer came from “an amazing study done at the Hutch,” said June, led by Dr. Paul Weiden with Thomas, Storb and others. It compared the outcomes in leukemia patients whose donors had been identical twins to those whose donors had been regular siblings. Early on, identical twins were considered ideal donors because their immune systems would exactly match that of the patient, thus avoiding graft-vs.-host disease, or GVHD — a serious, often fatal condition in which the newly donated immune system attacks the patient’s body as “foreign.” But in two pivotal studies published in the late 1970s and early 1980s, Weiden and others showed that the patients with non-identical donors who developed GVHD had lower rates of their cancer returning, suggesting a “graft-vs.-leukemia” effect.
“That led to the conclusion that has held up to today that it was basically an immune response — immunotherapy delivered by the transplant — that cured the patients who had [difficult-to-treat] leukemia,” June said. “It was the first human data that the immune system mattered in cancer.”
Much of the research that followed focused on how to get the best graft-vs.-leukemia effect while limiting GVHD. But also from this sprang the idea of taking T cells from the patients themselves instead of from donors and tweaking them to fight cancer — so-called adoptive T cell therapies.
“Studies of the immunology of adoptive T-cell therapy started in cancer mouse models,” said June. “[Drs.] Mac Cheever and Phil Greenberg did those at the Fred Hutch.”
From cancer to HIV and back
After his time at Fred Hutch, June opened his own lab in 1986 at the Naval Medical Research Institute in Bethesda, Maryland. Because the Navy funds research on casualty care and infectious diseases but not cancer, he continued to do basic research on T cells but focused his efforts on HIV.
Tapping his past Hutch research and working with then postdoctoral research fellow, now lab partner Dr. Bruce Levine, he perfected a method for multiplying T cells outside of the body that is widely used today. They infused laboratory-grown T cells back into a small number of patients with late-stage HIV/AIDS whose own T cells had been ravaged by their infections, showing that it could be done safely and that it boosted the patients’ depleted immune function.
He and his lab also collaborated on studies using the HIV virus itself — shorn of its ability to cause disease — as a vector, or tool, to genetically modify T cells so that they would attack HIV-infected cells. He conducted the first human trials using CAR T cells in people with HIV. Again, they showed the approach was safe, feasible and able to improve patients' immune function.
A personal tragedy brought June back to cancer research with a new urgency: In late 1995, his wife, Cindy, was diagnosed with ovarian cancer.
She died in 2001, the year he enrolled his first leukemia patient in a clinical trial testing an experimental adoptive T-cell therapy, similar to the early trial he had done for people with HIV.
By then, June had retired from the Navy and started his lab at Penn. Although his main focus had become cancer, he continued to draw from his HIV research.
“Being in two camps at one time made a huge, huge impact,” he said. “For me, it was very useful to learn about virology and HIV. If you’re only in one field, you tend to get isolated. But with multidisciplinary interactions, it’s easier to find new steps that haven’t even been thought about rather than incremental steps.”