Better diagnostics are coming
Essential for controlling infectious disease is accurate and early identification of the organisms that may cause it. If a test can identify the threat as a virus, rather than a bacterium, doctors will know they can stop giving antibiotics, which are useless against viruses and carry a wide range of side effects — such as killing helpful bacteria in the gut microbiome.
In a keynote address, Duke University infectious disease specialist Dr. Christopher Woods showed how tests that display which genes in a patient’s immune cells are turned on or off can identify — through distinctive patterns like fingerprints — what germs those cells are encountering. He calls it “harnessing the host responses” for diagnosis.
Using emerging technologies called single-cell RNA sequencing, it may be possible to make important diagnostic findings within five minutes, he said. “We are on the cusp of some exciting opportunities,” he said.
We need to protect our antibiotics
As Woods noted in his talk, as many as half the antibiotics prescribed to patients are not needed. Improper use of antibiotics can promote the growth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which are responsible for 23,000 deaths in the U.S., he said. This is of concern to transplant physicians, who prescribe lots of antibiotics and for whose patients the right antibiotic may be the difference between survival or death.
“There is a storm coming,” said Dr. Josh Wolff, director of antimicrobial stewardship at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee. “Antimicrobial resistance affects how we are able to treat our patients and how we will be able to look after them in the future.”
Dr. Monica Slavin, an infectious-disease expert at the Royal Melbourne Hospital in Australia explained how difficult it can be to make decisions to withhold antibiotics to prevent disease. She presented data from her hospital that showed it could do so safely with a system in place to manage bloodstream infections should they occur. She also cited a pair of studies, one Dutch and one German, that looked at whether it was safe to drop preventive treatment of transplant patients with fluoroquinolones, a potent class of antibiotics. Both studies concluded that it was safe to drop them, but in both cases, the hospitals involved elected not to.
“What drives a lot of antibiotic prescribing,” Slavin said, “is fear.”
Fred Hutch researcher Dr. Catherine Liu, who is director of antimicrobial stewardship at Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, the Hutch’s clinical care partner, said advanced diagnostic technologies can help doctors decide which medicines to use and when to use them. “Being able to know when it is necessary to use an antibiotic and when it is not is critically important. I think having better diagnostics is going to be really important in helping us sort that out,” she said.
Training a new generation
The two-day conference was also an opportunity to expose up-and-coming medical students and researchers to the excitement in this field. “One key objective of the conference was to increase participation of the next generation of clinicians and researchers in infections in the immunocompromised host,” Boeckh said. “We provided travel grants to 59 trainees, many of them women and underrepresented minorities.”
Arvin Jundoria, a third-year medical student at Howard University College of Medicine in Washington, D.C., was thrilled to attend and presented a poster on her case study of a patient who came into the emergency room in respiratory distress. His doctors discovered he was infected with HIV and had Kaposi sarcoma in his lungs, and he eventually succumbed to the disease. Her experience in Seattle only deepened her interest in infections, particularly sepsis, caused by harmful bacteria in the bloodstream.
“I want to become an emergency room physician and cure sepsis,” she said.